The report describes this as a “serious early error” that Britain shared with many countries in Europe and North America. ![]() As a result, the government sought merely to manage the spread of the coronavirus instead of trying to stop it altogether. The government’s strategy during the first three months of the crisis reflected official scientific advice that widespread infection was inevitable because testing capacity was limited, there was no immediate prospect for a vaccine and officials believed the public wouldn’t accept a lengthy lockdown, the report says. ![]() You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times. has played a leading part,” the committees said.īut they also criticized the government’s test-and-trace program, saying its slow, uncertain and often chaotic performance hampered Britain’s response to the pandemic. “Millions of lives will ultimately be saved as a result of the global vaccine effort in which the U.K. These decisions led to Britain’s successful inoculation program, which has seen almost 80% of people 12 and older now fully vaccinated. The committees praised the government’s early focus on vaccines as the ultimate way out of the pandemic and its decision to invest in vaccine development. It was unanimously approved by 22 lawmakers from the three largest parties in Parliament: the governing Conservatives, the opposition Labor Party and the Scottish National Party. The report is based on testimony from 50 witnesses, including former Health Secretary Matt Hancock - who resigned after violating coronavirus protocols - and former Johnson aide Dominic Cummings. government despite questions over their accuracy. Innova Medical Group in Pasadena secured contracts worth at least $2.7 billion selling Chinese-made antigen tests to the U.K. Johnson says the inquiry will start in the spring.īusiness A Pasadena startup got billions selling COVID tests. The parliamentary report comes amid frustration with the timetable for a formal public inquiry into the government’s response to COVID-19. “This is an attempt to ignore and gaslight bereaved families, who will see it as a slap in the face.” ![]() meetings than it is in the experiences of those who tragically lost parents, partners or children to COVID-19,” said Hannah Brady, spokesperson for COVID-19 Bereaved Families for Justice. “The report it’s produced is laughable and more interested in political arguments about whether you can bring laptops to. They said the joint committee was interested only in “speaking to their colleagues and friends.” “We were learning about it as we went through, and of course with hindsight, there’s things we know about it now that we didn’t know at the time.”īereaved families reacted to the parliamentary report with outrage, furious that the people who died of COVID-19 received scant mention in the 150-page document. “It was an unprecedented pandemic,″ Cabinet minister Stephen Barclay told Sky News. California Can California avoid another COVID-19 surge? Britain offers a sober warningĬalifornia’s overall pandemic trends appear to be improving, but that course has been upended before.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |